For the security of the community
Many properties will choose to install electric doors
The door follows the entry and exit of the owner
Can be opened and closed flexibly
But last year
A property owner in Qinhuai District, Nanjing
An accident occurred while passing through the electric gate of the community
Eventually died unfortunately span>
Recently, the Qinhuai Court reviewed this case
The first instance judgment was made
At noon on June 11, 2020, an owner of a community in Qinhuai went out on a bicycle. The property security guard opened the electric door. After the owner went out, the electric door slowly closed. At this time, the 59-year-old owner Wang \”ran over\” on an electric bicycle and wanted to I rushed out before the electric door closed and was hit by the electric door.Leading people to fall to the ground.
Mr. Yao, the person in charge of the property company, said that the security guard only helped the car in front to open the door in accordance with the work requirements. Community owners are equipped with access control cards and there are buttons beside the door. Even if the security guard does not help, they can go in and out by themselves.
Wang himself had underlying diseases, so he was hospitalized repeatedly due to this injury, and eventually died of septic shock. Wang’s family members believe that Wang’s death is closely related to this injury, and feel that the property management company failed to fulfill its safety protection obligations. Therefore, the property company was brought to court, demanding compensation for various expenses totaling more than 640,000 yuan.
The property company disclosed during the court hearing that I argued with reason and believed that my safety protection obligations had been fulfilled. There are slogans posted at the entrance of the community indicating the location of the switch buttons, and security guards often remind everyone to slow down when entering and exiting the door.
Pei Mei, judge of the First Civil Division of the People\’s Court of Qinhuai District, said that disputes between property owners and property owners have always been a hot topic. Judgments in similar cases specifically examine two aspects. The first is whether both parties abide by relevant contractual provisions. According to the property contract, Whether the property has insufficient services; the second involves the scope of property safety protection obligations. In this case, there was no quality problem with the electric door of the property.
After investigation, the court determined that the community property had fulfilled its safety protection obligations. In this case, Wang himself was at fault. It was precisely because he violated the usage of the electric door that he fell. Therefore, the court ruled to reject the plaintiff\’s claim.
Source: Nanjing Zero Distance (
本站内容及图片来自网络,版权归原作者所有,内容仅供读者参考,不承担相关法律责任,如有侵犯请联系我们:609448834