Will replacing security doors cause obvious obstacles to neighbors? Court: Restore the status quo ante!

During renovation, a new anti-theft door was installed close to the neighbor\’s door. The neighbor thinks that the new anti-theft door poses an obvious obstacle to him. Should the door be restored to its original state? The Beijing Third Intermediate People\’s Court recently heard a civil dispute.

Case Brief

Lao Li is the owner of House 402, and Xiao Zhang is the owner of House 401 on that floor. The houses of both parties are adjacent. On July 13, 2022, Xiao Zhang renovated the house and modified the security door. Lao Li believed that Xiao Zhang ordered workers to break the edge of his own security door when he modified the security door. The 401 security door was too large and took the entire space between the two doors as his own. When 401 dismantled his own security door, he The filling cement on the side of the 402 anti-theft door was shaken off and part of it leaked out of the door frame. The cement in other parts was somewhat loose but not falling off. Lao Li requested that the damaged parts be repaired before installing the door. While Lao Li went downstairs to look for the community, Xiao Zhang asked workers to install the door. After the police from the community and the police station arrived at the scene, they could no longer see the previously smashed parts. Xiao Zhang said that the door installer had used foam glue to repair the damaged parts. Processing, cannot open the door to view. At that time, Lao Li reported to the property management company that the customer service center manager and engineer inspected the situation on site and presented a \”Situation Statement\” stamped with the seal of the property management company.

Lao Li sued the court and asked Xiao Zhang to remove the security door of House 401, repair the damaged wall between House 402 and House 401 and the door frame of House 402, and restore them to their original condition. Xiao Zhang disagreed with Lao Li\’s claim and believed that the distance between the two houses was used for installing anti-theft door frames, which was a reasonable use and did not constitute encroachment. At present, Lao Li\’s house has not been renovated, and it will not affect Lao Li\’s current travel and use. During the lawsuit, the court conducted an on-site inspection and found that the distance between the security doors of neighbors of the same apartment type in the building was 7.5 centimeters.

Court Judgment

After hearing, the Beijing No. 3 Intermediate People’s Court held that according to the “Statement of Situation” issued by the property management company, it can be seen that during the installation of the security door of house 401, the filling cement on the side of door 402 was shaken off. Part of it leaked out of the door frame, so Xiao Zhang should bear the responsibility for repairing it. According to the photos involved in the case and the on-site inspection, the new security door installed by Xiao Zhang changed the original state that had existed for many years and covered the 7.5 cm white wall between the door frames on both sides, causing the security doors of both houses to be close to each other. Future updates to the security door of Lao Li\’s house Causes obvious obstacles, so Xiao Zhang should restore the original state.

Therefore, the court ruled that Xiao Zhang should dismantle the anti-theft door of house 401, reinstall it with a distance of 7.5 cm from the anti-theft door frame of house 402, restore the gap to a white wall, and remove the cement that was knocked off the door of house 402. Fill repair.

The principle of mutual assistance, fairness and reasonableness, and the correct handling of adjacent relationships. \”Adjacent relationships refer to the rights of two or more adjacent real estate owners in terms of ventilation, lighting, water use, drainage, and access when exercising their real estate rights. mutual convenience and access formedrights and obligations arising from restrictions. The purpose of establishing real estate adjacent relationships by law is to ensure as much as possible the harmonious relationship between adjacent real estate rights holders, to resolve conflicts between two or more adjacent real estate rights holders due to the exercise of their rights, and to safeguard the interests of all parties adjacent to real estate. balance of interests. The adjacent relationship is the extension or restriction of the right holder of the adjacent real estate to exercise his rights. The real estate right holder who provides the other party with necessary convenience is the party whose rights are restricted. Therefore, the real estate right holder who obtains the necessary convenience is the party whose rights are extended. This is This extension is necessary to exercise real property rights.

In modern society, people gradually realize that the exercise of real estate rights cannot be absolute. In order to prevent real estate rights holders from hindering social progress and public interests due to the absolute exercise of their rights, it is necessary to regulate the exercise of real estate rights. In particular, necessary restrictions are imposed on the exercise of real property rights. Based on the legal provisions on neighbor relationships, there are two main restrictions on the exercise of rights by real estate rights holders: First, real estate rights holders cannot do whatever they want within their real estate, thereby affecting the normal use and tranquility of their neighbors\’ real estate. Second, real estate rights holders must provide certain conveniences for their neighbors to use their real estate, that is, they must tolerate their neighbors\’ use of their real estate within a reasonable scope for the normal operation and management of their real estate.

In this case, when Xiao Zhang refitted the security door of his neighbor Lao Li’s house, he filled the cement on the security door of his neighbor Lao Li’s house and knocked off part of the door frame. This behavior caused damage to Lao Li. According to the Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China The Code of Conduct stipulates that “If an actor causes damage due to his fault in infringing upon the civil rights and interests of others, he shall bear tort liability.” Therefore, Xiao Zhang should bear the responsibility for repairing this. According to the photos and on-site inspections involved in the case, the new security door installed by Xiao Zhang changed the original state that had existed for many years, covering the 7.5 cm white wall between the door frames on both sides, causing the security doors of both houses to be close to each other, which would have a negative impact on the future update of Lao Li\’s security door. There are obvious obstacles, so Xiao Zhang should return to the original state.

The \”Civil Code of the People\’s Republic of China\” stipulates that civil subjects engaged in civil activities must not violate the law or violate public order and good customs. Promoting the core socialist values ​​is the basic moral norm for citizens, the basic moral code that citizens must abide by, and the basic value standard for evaluating citizens\’ moral behavior choices. \”Friendship\” in the core socialist values ​​emphasizes that citizens should respect each other, care for each other, help each other, be harmonious and friendly, and strive to form a new socialist interpersonal relationship. As the old saying goes, “distant relatives are not as good as close neighbors.” Being kind to neighbors is also an inherent requirement of the socialist core values ​​for the behavior of civil subjects in the context of this specific case.

The court reminded everyone that when dealing with conflicts and disputes between neighbors, they should uphold the principle of friendliness, help each other, understand and give in to each other, and jointly build a good neighborhood relationship and community environment.

Author: Jin Yanxi Zhu Hongzhe

Reprinted from: China Court Network

Source: Shandong High Court

本站内容及图片来自网络,版权归原作者所有,内容仅供读者参考,不承担相关法律责任,如有侵犯请联系我们:609448834

Like (0)
华夏门网的头像华夏门网
Previous 2025年1月15日
Next 2025年1月15日

相关推荐

  • 如何选择安全又时尚的家用防盗门?

    家庭安全一直是我们生活中最为关注的话题之一。而作为家庭安全的第一道防线,家用防盗门的选择就显得尤为重要了。在选择家用防盗门时,不仅要注重其款式与美观度,更要关注安全性能。 一、 要考虑防盗门的材质和结构 优质的防盗门通常由钢材制成,具有较高的抗冲击和防撬能力。门框和门扇之间的连接也非常重要,应该采用坚固的连接方式,如焊接或铆接。此外,防盗门的锁具也是关键因素…

    防盗门 2023年11月12日
    30
  • 房子装修,防盗门挑选认准5个要点,能省几千块

    房子装修,先要花心思的是选门,门的安全性关乎着家居生活的安全,所以不能马虎,怎么选一个实用的防盗门呢,记住这5个要点! 防盗门挑选认准5个要点,能省几千块 1、 看防盗等级 分甲乙丙丁四个级别,安全系数甲>乙>丙>丁,✅选甲。 2、看锁芯 防盗门关键、核心的就是门锁,锁芯按照安全性分为A、B、C三种,安全系数C>B>A>,…

    防盗门 2023年10月6日
    80
  • 改裝自傢防盜門影響鄰居出行,法院判決恢復原樣

    新京報訊(記者慕宏舉)近日,新京報記者從北京市豐臺區人民法院獲悉瞭一起改裝防盜門引發的民事糾紛案:老人改裝自傢防盜門影響鄰居出行,溝通無果後被告上法庭。法院最終判決老人對其安裝的防盜門進行整改,恢復至合理狀態。 新京報記者瞭解到,老張與老李是鄰居,老張居住在601房屋,老李居住在602房屋,老李裝修時拆掉602房屋原有的入戶門,將原有門框向外延伸,同時更換成…

    防盗门 2024年10月22日
    10
  • 防盗门旧貌换新颜,居民安全有保障

    近日,宝山区长宏新苑小区居民在“社区通”议事厅版块反映:小区内的部分防盗门残旧不堪,存在锈蚀、破损情况,存在较大安全隐患,希望物业公司能够集中对这些防盗门进行更换。这个提议引发了居民们的广泛关注和讨论,大家纷纷表示赞同。 更换前 在征得有意向更换防盗门的居民们的一致同意后,物业公司立即行动,迅速推进实施防盗门更换项目。居民们积极配合,主动清理楼道内的堆物,并…

    防盗门 2024年3月2日
    160
  • 拜托!买入户门前好好看看攻略呀

    不要花冤枉钱啦!很多人不知道怎么选防盗门,踩坑的不少。今天业内人员告诉大家,入户门怎么选? 选防盗门是得看颜值,但是也不能只看颜值。如果你确定这款防盗门可以搭配家里的装修风格,自己也喜欢它的设计,接下来就要看这些。 买有甲级标识的防盗门(这个标准国家定的,照着买不会有错,标识一般在门框两侧,安全系数甲>Z>丙>丁) 认准C级锁芯的。 门板厚…

    防盗门 2023年11月6日
    170

联系我们

400-800-8888

在线咨询: QQ交谈

邮件:admin@example.com

工作时间:周一至周五,9:30-18:30,节假日休息

关注微信