Is it legal to change your home door? Court judgment

From ancient times to the present, the harmonious neighborhood relationship is related to everyone\’s life. Many of the contradictions between neighbors are related to decoration. For example, after changing to the household door, do you want to pretend? The door of my own home, did you say it yourself? In this case, a resident was sued by the court because of the renovation of the door -to -door orientation.

Mr. Liu lives in a community in Xicheng District, Beijing. His family is on the third floor and lives in Room 308. It is adjacent to Room 307. It is also because of the entrance door of Room 307, Mr. Liu brought his neighbors to court.

The comprehensive trial court of the Xicheng District People\’s Court of Beijing: The plaintiff said that the two households were originally 307 and 308. All opened inwardly For many years, the relationship between the plaintiff and the original 307 old owners has always been very good, and there is no controversy. But since the new owner came, he found that the new owner not only widen the door frame, but also changed the original door to the outward opening.

Mr. Liu believes that the new neighbor of 307 has changed the entrance door from the inside to the outside, which has made Mr. Liu and his family dangerous and caused great hidden safety hazards.

Zhao Kai, judge of the comprehensive trial court of Xicheng District, Beijing: The plaintiff believes that when he goes out or enter the door, if the defendant opens the door at the same time, he will hit his family. In addition, if there is a fire or other emergencies in the building, when the plaintiff\’s family needs to escape, because the defendant also needs to escape at the same time, the defendant\’s door will hinder the passage of the plaintiff\’s family\’s escape.

The defendant believes that the construction plan meets the requirements of the decoration and renovation of the community.

Therefore, Mr. Liu asked the 307 homeowner to change the entrance door to the room. But at this point, Mr. 307, Mr. Ship in Room 307, did not recognize it. Mr. Zhang said that the relevant construction plan and construction drawings of their home decoration have been reviewed by the community property filing, which meets the requirements of the decoration and renovation of the community. notgin-web: gif.jpeg? _IZ = 58558 & from = Article.pc_detail & LK3S = 95319 2F4 & X-EXPIRES = 173881112 & X-SIGNATUR Lowuq%3d \”/>

Zhao Kai, Judge of the People\’s Court of Xicheng District, Beijing: Room 307 Mr. Fang advocated that the anti -theft door was provided by finding a regular decoration company. All these products were qualified and met national standards. Moreover, he also had a record for the property. Objury. It is not the only residents who have changed the entrance door from the inside to the outside. Due to the design problems of the community, the public areas at the door of the two parties can only stand down 2 people. It also needs to be modest, which has nothing to do with whether the entrance door is inside or outside. As a result, the area in front of the two doors is too narrow, which has nothing to do with him pretending to be a theft door, and whether he is pretending to be a anti -theft door, they think that when he enters and exit the house, they will observe it carefully. No one, they opened the door again.

Careful observation of the defendant\’s travel will be observed, and the plaintiff Mr. Liu said that he did not recognize it. img src = \”https://p3-sign.toutiaoimg.com/tos-cn-i-tjoges91tu/8165a43d71897FFDB81F72835FC49-tplv- origin-jpeg?_iz= 58558 & from = article.pc_detail & lk3s = 953192F4 & X-EXPIRES = 173881112 & X-Signature = FE%2BWFFSPX%2BP4IW4BVT2ZF6H5G9G%3D \”/>

Judge Zhao Kai, judge of the comprehensive trial court of the Beijing Xicheng District People\’s Court: The plaintiff mentioned that my parents were in my house in their 70s. It is the youngest child who is only two years old. If the collision occurs, the pain is the plaintiff that he cannot bear it. This kind of damage happened to see \”Cat\’s Eyes\”, and he could not bear such pain.

This seems to beReasons

Do you want to change the direction of the door to open the door?

What kind of judgment will the court make?

\”Change\” to the plaintiff\’s obstacle and risk judgment

The court hearing believes that the neighboring right holders of real estate should Principles, properly handle adjacent relationships.

In this case, when Room 307 enters the household door from the inside to the outside, due to the blind spot of the field of vision, the door may collide with Mr. Liu or his family who stays outside or enter and exit Room 308. During the fire escape, if the door 307 entered the household door, it would also obstruct the escape of the residents of Room 308. Regardless of the above situations, it is likely to cause personal damage to both parties, which is particularly likely to cause injuries to the elderly and children.

<img src = \"https://p3-sign.toutiaoimg.com/tos-cn- I-TJOGES91TU/8b9cdc53BF0DC32EBCAE033892C13~tplv- origin-web:gif.jpeg? _iz = 58558 & from = article.pc_detail & lk3s = 953192F4 & X-EXPIRES = 173881112 & X-Signature = NT1QQKJ%2FZGN%2F5%2BNF0DS%3D \"/

The court believes that according to the common sense of life, the current opening direction of the door to the door is caused to the residents of Room 308. The reality is obstructive With potential risks, Mr. Liu asked Mr. Zhang to change the direction of room 307 to enter the door of the household door.

Zhao Kai, judge of the comprehensive trial court of the Xicheng District People\’s Court of Beijing: In fact, our law also advocates that during the process of handling adjacent relationships, it causes some minor obstruction to our neighbors, or some inconveniences, or some inconveniences, or some inconveniences. There are some tolerances, but in this case, we considers most of the old and children who live in the plaintiff. In fact, the defendant will actually live in the future. When the defendant\’s house is opened outwards, there will be a obstacle to the entrance and exit of the plaintiff, and there will be a lot of inconvenience when they escape. Finally, considering such a factors comprehensively, the direction of the defendant\’s entry door opening still affects the plaintiff, so he ordered the defendant to change the direction of the opening door.

The judge said that some residents installed anti-theft doors in public spaces, stacked shoe cabinets, debris, etc. This behavior is not only affected by this behavior, but also serious fire safety hazards in the neighborhood. Zhao Kai, judge of the court comprehensive trial court: We still want to advocate that when the neighbor is exercising the right right, we must pay attention not to obstruct others. There may be some inevitable inconvenience. You can tolerate some and do some concessions. /p>

Source: CCTV News Client