In this world, there was a light aircraft carrier that was far more than many countries in the world. Multi-time-building-this maritime steel beast is a battleship. As a steel monster that is still being led by people, there are still a large number of clusters of the design and every move. But have anyone thought about it countless times, can the battleship be reorganized and then on the battlefield? The website of the United States \”National Interest\” and the US \”Naval Academy\” website continuously published many articles to discuss the matter. The core content is that is now equipped with multi-type anti-ship missiles such as \”Dongfeng-21D\” to \”Eagle Strike 12\”, and even the aircraft carrier battle group dare not easily swim within its range; Therefore, this era needs to be able to carry a new combat platform that can be able to carry multiple anti -ship missile saturation strikes, and the most suitable platform to modify this new maritime equipment is the battleships that sleep in the port of the United States.
Who can laugh at the end of the Chinese anti-anti-ship missile? 222 mm armor is really not for nothing
As the four\” Iwah \”class battleships that still exist in the United States now, in the eyes of these experts Modify the most effective platform of Chinese anti -ship missile saturation. The last battleship of the U.S. Navy has a full -load displacement of 58,000 tons, which has far exceeded light aircraft carriers in many countries. The thickest part of its armor has 480 mm, that is, the average armor thick on the horizontal planeThe degree can also reach 222 mm. And this thickness means that only the modern anti -ship missile of the semi -armor -piercing combat department is likely to be unable to cause fatal damage to it. About 200 kilograms of battle department below the medium-sized anti-ship missile, which means that the Chinese Eagle-83 anti-ship missile may not be able to wear it.
Everyone knows that the armored ship\’s armor is not only above the water line, but also under the water, so that several heavy torpedo may not sink. Moreover, the battleship design itself is multiple defensive multiple redundant structures, and has better anti -destruction and crackdown capabilities. The design of the anti -ship missile we now use itself is aimed at the non -heavy armored defense capabilities that modern enemy ships are not heavy. After penetrating the enemy armor, it will generate air explosion internally, thereby expanding the lethality. However, in the face of the armor of the armor of the deck, the thickness of the armor of the deck is close to 200 mm thick, it is really difficult to wear it. Of course, there are still some effects similar to China ’s Hawk Strike-12 at a speed of 4 Mach, but there are many cabins in the battleship itself, and there are many partitions. Of course, there are many crew members. There are 1,800 people. Needless to say, the hard resistance 2 to 3 eagle strike-12 is definitely no problem. Of course, it is not too much to fight for the battleships. Therefore, under the condition of super saturation, it should still be sinking, but it is necessary to see how many missiles China will use it to launch it. Therefore, if the United States really took out a heavy battleship with Chinese hard resistance, the result on the battlefield was really not good; it may be sinking by the super saturated missile, or it may be because the density of the guided missile rain was not enough to let the density of the rainmakers let the rainy density of the rainmakers let the rainy density of the guided missile. The American battleship escaped.
(The Chinese Hawk-12 strike ship schematic shows that modern ships do have no resistance to such heavy missiles, but it is really inaccessible to change the battleship! )
9-door 406mm heavy artillery combat effectiveness is really powerful. /ul>
In this way, the battleship does have the innate condition to deal with the saturation of modern missiles. In addition, the tonnage of the battleship determines that its hull has a relatively abundant space, Especially the \”Yihua\” class has a three -combined MK.7 406 mm/50 times caliber heavy cannon In the past, the lethality also had a very amazing effect: a large pit with a diameter of 12 meters and a depth of 5 meters, all creatures within 100 meters around will be shocked, and the ones within 250 meters will be damaged. and the rate of fire is not very slow, 2 rounds per minute. Of course, compared with the current missile\’s lethality, it is slightly insufficient, but in the past, this is the equipment of the large killing device. In addition, a turret itself weighs 108 tons. The space and such as the magazine library of the bullet and ammunition library below are huge. A 3 -combined turret is retained. Kirov \”Class nuclear -powered cruiser. If all three turrets are replaced and 1 electromagnetic rail cannon is installed, this is the real \”armored tanker\”. In the power, 8 Babcock & Wilcox heavy oil water pipe boilers and 4 sets of universal electrical electrical gear transmission rotations have a total power of 156,000 kilowatts of exterior diesel electricity units to ensure that an electromagnetic rail cannon is still quite rich. There are also 10 38 times caliber 127 mm caliber dual -combined high -level high -level dual -use guns. After removing, the \”dense array\” near -air gun and \”Hailim\” near -missile -proof guided missiles are dismantled. High survival probability. In this way, even if the anti-ship missile defense circle that bursts into China, even if it is possible to cope with the Tongfeng-21D and Eagle-12-12 strikes, it can ensure the combat effectiveness. Moreover, who said that the United States must go to China? Such a warship full of long -range weapons can use the \”Tomahawk\” series missile to launch a missile crackdown on missiles, let aloneThe electromagnetic rail cannon strikes a small country without anti -ship weapons.
Does the US battleship have restarted value? Save money may become the last word
As for some people think that this improvement will be too troublesome? The U.S. media also listed the process of Russian Kilov -class \”Nashimov Navy\” cruiser improvement process, indicating that this giant ship has great potential, and the cost of modification is not as great as expected. About 1 billion US dollars can be transformed. Compared to the US $ 13.9 billion construction costs of the US \”Ford\”-class aircraft carrier, and the \”Alley Berk-III\” construction costs of $ 4.2 billion, this overhead is really valuable! Of course, this is just a demonstration of some experts from the US Navy, but it also reflects a problem. When the cost of modern large -scale new warships is getting higher and higher, and even Americans who are rich in wealth may not bear it, can other navy around the world be able to Continue to make an article on the original large ship? The Navy is a century -old navy and a long -term operation of the navy. It is obviously not suitable to continue to go through the retirement of old ships. It may be more effective to better maintain the development of the ship\’s ecological chain. The Chinese Navy\’s improvement of 167 ships is a similar idea, but after all, China does not have a huge battle fleet such as the United States. Whether Americans can eventually restart the concept of the \”arsenal battleship\” again, maybe they need to look at the budget.The full text is over, thank you for your advice before, welcome more rational comments and interactions!
本站内容及图片来自网络,版权归原作者所有,内容仅供读者参考,不承担相关法律责任,如有侵犯请联系我们：609448834
